Thursday, March 9, 2017

Contaminated seafood from China is flooding the United States

Contaminated seafood from China is flooding the United States

 
Image: Contaminated seafood from China is flooding the United States, are you safe?
 
(Natural News) Do you really know what is going to be on your plate when you purchase seafood? There’s a good chance you don’t — and maybe you don’t want to know. Seafood laced with antibiotics is flooding the marketplace here in the U.S., and if that isn’t disturbing enough, most of this seafood is coming from China — where it was most likely raised on pig feces.
Upwards of 80 percent of the seafood in the U.S. is imported, and a good portion of that is of Chinese origin. In 2016, it was estimated that nearly 30 percent of the seafood Americans eat actually comes from China. In 2014, $2.9 billion worth of seafood was imported from the nation, making it the third largest importer to the States.
As Bloomberg describes, livestock pens are scattered among the Chinese fisheries. To feed the fish, they simply wash the feces down a pipe that empties out into a pond, and the fish are taken care of. Would you knowingly eat fish that had spent its life in a pond of excrement? Probably not. But, this method of “recycling” has been used in Chinese agriculture for thousands of years. What fattens the pigs also fattens up the fish. Beyond the sanitary concerns of such a process, the introduction of antibiotics to animal feed has served to create an even bigger threat to public health.
Upwards of 90 percent of the antibiotics shovel-fed to pigs pass through their digestive systems intact and without degradation. This means that the antibiotics passed through their urine and feces are often still active when they hit the water. And as their waste flows into the ponds for fish food, the little fishes are all being exposed to nearly the same amount of antibiotics that are being fed to the livestock — and that’s on top of the antibiotics that are purposefully put into the water to prevent and treat aquatic diseases.
The low standards and lax regulations in China have resulted in seafood riddled with detestable substances and essentially soaked in antibiotics. Isn’t that appetizing?
In 2016, a study by the FDA found that 25 percent of the fish and seafood coming from China had traces of chemicals that were forbidden from being used in seafood in the United States — some of which were unapproved drugs and hazardous food additives. Some of the substances found included nitrofurans (a group of antibiotics), green malachite (an antibacterial compound) and Genetian violet (an antiseptic dye). All of these substances are prohibited from being used in seafood and are considered to be carcinogenic.
A study of Chinese seafood from the years 2006 to 2011 also concluded that 43 percent of the samples contained multidrug-resistant strains of bacteria.
Even wild-caught Chinese fish is often no safer than the factory-farmed varieties. As Natural Health365 explains, many of China’s major fishing areas are deeply contaminated with industrial waste, chemical fertilizers, and heavy metals.
Fortunately, it is entirely possible to protect yourself from toxic seafood. It is essential that you carefully read all product labels to determine the country of origin. Terms like “prepared in,” “packed in,” or “imported by” should all be seen as little red flags, as they often indicate that the fish were raised and processed in two different locations.
Because farming of fish is not allowed in the state of Alaska, and because the state charter forbids river pollution, wild Alaskan salmon is one of the best options for seafood. Choosing fresh fish over frozen, and smaller fish in general, are also good ways to ensure you are not purchasing toxin-laden seafood.

Tuesday, March 7, 2017

FRUIET LABELLING BY STICKERS

 
FRUIT LABELLING BY STICKERS

If You See THIS Label On the Fruit Do Not Buy It at Any Cost!


I am positive that everyone reading this has bought a piece of produce, and if you have you might have noticed a small sticker with numbers written on it. You might not pay attention to things like that, but maybe you should!
You might just think that they are some mark that manufacturers use for their own purpose, but the truth is that these numbers are meaningful and they can tell a lot about the product.
p8BC7Bd

Branded foods found laced with glyphosate weed killer

Brand name processed foods found laced with glyphosate weed killer… Cheerios, Wheaties and more

Image: Brand name processed foods found laced with glyphosate weed killer… Cheerios, Wheaties and more
(Natural News) Glyphosate is the active ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide and many other commercially available weed killers. Due to the widespread adoption of genetically modified (GM) crops, glyphosate has become the most commonly used weed killer in the conventional farming industry. GM glyphosate-resistant crops are now grown on more than 175 million acres in the United States and more than 440 million acres worldwide. Each year, more than 300 million pounds of glyphosate-based herbicides are sprayed on American food crops, lawns, and gardens.
Recently, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) declared glyphosate as a “probable carcinogen.” As more health risks associated with glyphosate exposure start to emerge, the European Union remains uncertain whether it will renew its authorization of glyphosate in commercial products in Europe.
Furthermore, recent safety testing has shown that glyphosate residues can cause harm to human health, even at ultra-low levels. While the evidence is clear, the U.S. authorities, unfortunately, keep allowing this dangerous toxin to end up in our food chain at worrying levels. Safety testing of glyphosate residues in Roundup-sprayed crops is often ignored and unreliable.
While Monsanto has continuously claimed that Roundup is harmless to our health, multiple studies are painting a different picture. Regular exposure to glyphosate has been linked to chronic conditions such as autism, Crohn’s disease, allergies, depression, cancer, multiple sclerosis, and infertility. (RELATED: Stay informed about more glyphosate news at Glyphosate.news.)

Glyphosate found in many processed foods

Anresco Laboratories in San Francisco, an FDA-registered food safety lab, recently conducted their own research to see whether glyphosate can be found in commonly consumed processed foods. And their tests revealed the worst. Previous research has shown that glyphosate or glyphosate residues of only 0.05 parts per billion (ppb) can cause damage to at least 4,000 genes, while 10 ppb may cause serious health effects, such as kidney and liver damage. Anresco’s results, however, indicated that some of the tested foods had up to 1,000 times that amount.
The testing and analysis were requested by Food Democracy Now! and The Detox Project, who bundled the results in a 29-page report called “Glyphosate: UNSAFE ON ANY PLATE.” According to the report, U.S. regulators currently allow a very high level of daily glyphosate residues in our food. The authors hope their report can serve as a strong wake-up call for all Americans to reconsider their consumption of some of their favorite processed foods.
Furthermore, Food Democracy Now! has called for a federal investigation into the damaging effects of glyphosate and the relationships between the industry and the regulators that allow these toxins to end up in our food chain.
Below you’ll find an overview of common brand names and the amount of glyphosate that was found in some of their products, with General Mills Cheerios topping the list with an astonishing 1,125.3 ppb.
brand-name-glyphosate
Chart source: Food Democrazy Now! – Glyphosate: UNSAFE ON ANY PLATE.

Monday, March 6, 2017

“Najib-Jho Low” axis “Ali Baba” partnership

The biggest “Ali Baba” partnership in Malaysia is the “Najib-Jho Low” axis which has catapulted the country to a global kleptocracy with the largest worldwide financial scandal in recent times

I am very intrigued why the Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Razak has decided to pull out all the stops and launched into an unrestrained and unjustified attack on me when in Sindumin, Sabah yesterday.
What is the cause?
Has Najib given the “green light” for the holding of sudden Sabah state general elections and he is setting an example of the wild and unrestrained attacks which BN Sabah leaders should launch against the opposition in an attempt to preserve UMNO/BN power in Sabah state?
We will know soon enough whether there will be snap polls in Sabah.
However, even the imminence of a snap polls for the Sabah state assembly could be no justification for the unprincipled and baseless attacks which Najib launched against me in Sabah yesterday.
Najib said that I would be taking up the position of Deputy Prime Minister should UMNO/Barisan Nasional are ousted from Putrajaya and there is a change of Federal power in the 14th General Elections.
Apart from the truth that UMNO/BN may be ousted from Putrajaya and Federal power in the forthcoming general elections by Pakatan Harapan plus Bersatu, the rest of Najib’s attacks on me are a tissue of lies and falsehoods.
Why should a Prime Minister of a country stoop so low as to indulge in such lies and falsehoods in attacking the Opposition? Is Najib so desperate in his fear of being ousted as Prime Minister and losing the Federal government that he has lost all sense of proportion and moral scruples?
In his speech in Sabah yesterday, Najib said my appointment as Deputy Prime Minister had already been agreed on between Tun Mahathir Mohamad and myself, although no decision was made on who should be prime minister.
There are two lies here. I have never discussed with Tun Mahathir on the issues of DPM and PM.
Najib’s belief that I had a secret meeting with Tun Mahathir on Dec. 3 last year where an agreement was sealed for Mukhriz Mahathir to be Prime Minister and me as Deputy Prime Minister is a total figment of imagination of Najib’s propanganda handlers – as such a meeting never took place and I had never discussed with Tun Mahathir on who should be Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister when Najib/UMNO/BN are ousted from Putrajaya in the 14GE.
Najib’s subsequent allegations that with such an “Ali Baba” arrangement, I would be “incredibly powerful” – “the most powerful individual” – as this would be a situation where the Deputy Prime Minister would choose who is to be the Prime Minister, instead of the Prime Minister choosing the Deputy Prime Minister, are equally far-fetched and nonsensical.
I want to ask Najib what medicine is he taking that he could believe in such nonsense arising from the “fevered imaginations” of his propaganda handlers?
If Najib could believe in such out-of-the-world nonsense, what else won’t the Prime Minister believe?
I am wondering whether Najib should see a psychiatrist.
I am utterly shocked that the Prime Minister of the land could utter such gibberish that Pakatan Harapan had only agreed on who will be Deputy Prime Minister, not the Prime Minister, that he could rhetorically ask:
“Who will it (Prime Minister) be? (Dr) Wan Azizah (Wan Ismail)? Anwar (Ibrahim)? Muhyiddin (Yassin)?
“What was strange was that the deputy prime minister will appoint the prime minister. This is ‘ali baba’. The opposition is ‘ali baba’.
“This proved that Pakatan Harapan has failed as a coalition as compared to BN, which has achieved consensus among its 13 components.”
Najib has now achieved a double first as Prime Minister of Malaysia – firstly, for making Malaysia into a “global kleptocracy” in seven short years; and secondly, for uttering such gibberish and garbage which none of the previous five Prime Ministers, Tunku Abdul Rahman, his father Tun Razak, Tun Hussein, Tun Mahathir and Tun Abdullah, had ever been guilty of or even come near.
Has Najib become an inveterate liar that he could utter such gibberish and garbage of lies, or has Najib become a mental case that he could believe in such nonsense?
Najib could not be more wrong when he accused the Opposition as “ali baba” as the Opposition leaders have come together as Malaysian patriots and nationalists to save Malaysia from becoming a global kleptocracy and getting into the trajectory hurtling towards a failed and rogue state.
It is Najib himself who is responsible for creating the biggest and most sinister “Ali Baba” partnership in Malaysia – the “Najib-Jho Low” Ali-Baba axis which catapulted Malaysia to a global kleptocracy with the largest world-wide financial scandal in recent times, the international multi-billion dollar 1MDB kleptocratic money-laundering scandal.
Jho Low has become an international kleptocratic fugitive from justice.
However, I have been informed that the Prime Minister had a long and extended secret meeting with Jho Low in his last visit to China.
Is Najib prepared to make a Ministerial statement in Parliament on Tuesday of all his dealings with Jho Low, in connection with the 1MDB scandal, his series of meetings with Jho Low who had described by the foreign media as “the flamboyant Malaysian playboy and “orchestrator”of the 1MDB sovereign wealth fund scandal, when and where such meetings took place, and whether it is true that he had long and extended secret meetings with Jho Low in his last official visit to China.
Najib boasted that the Barisan Nasional had achieved consensus among its 13 components.
This would mean that if PAS President, Hadi Awang’s private member’s motion on the RUU 355 is given priority to be voted on in the March/April Parliament, followed by the government takeover of Hadi’s private member’s motion, it would have the consensus and agreement of MCA, Gerakan, MIC and the Sabah/Sarawak BN component parties.
I want to thank Najib for such clarification as if Hadi’s private member’s motion is passed in Parliament, MCA, Gerakan, MIC and the Sabah/Sarawak BN component parties cannot claim ignorance or evade responsibility!
DAP PARLIAMENTARY LEADER & MP FOR GELANG PATAH

“Najib-Jho Low” axis “Ali Baba” partnership

The biggest “Ali Baba” partnership in Malaysia is the “Najib-Jho Low” axis which has catapulted the country to a global kleptocracy with the largest worldwide financial scandal in recent times

I am very intrigued why the Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Razak has decided to pull out all the stops and launched into an unrestrained and unjustified attack on me when in Sindumin, Sabah yesterday.
What is the cause?
Has Najib given the “green light” for the holding of sudden Sabah state general elections and he is setting an example of the wild and unrestrained attacks which BN Sabah leaders should launch against the opposition in an attempt to preserve UMNO/BN power in Sabah state?
We will know soon enough whether there will be snap polls in Sabah.
However, even the imminence of a snap polls for the Sabah state assembly could be no justification for the unprincipled and baseless attacks which Najib launched against me in Sabah yesterday.
Najib said that I would be taking up the position of Deputy Prime Minister should UMNO/Barisan Nasional are ousted from Putrajaya and there is a change of Federal power in the 14th General Elections.
Apart from the truth that UMNO/BN may be ousted from Putrajaya and Federal power in the forthcoming general elections by Pakatan Harapan plus Bersatu, the rest of Najib’s attacks on me are a tissue of lies and falsehoods.
Why should a Prime Minister of a country stoop so low as to indulge in such lies and falsehoods in attacking the Opposition? Is Najib so desperate in his fear of being ousted as Prime Minister and losing the Federal government that he has lost all sense of proportion and moral scruples?
In his speech in Sabah yesterday, Najib said my appointment as Deputy Prime Minister had already been agreed on between Tun Mahathir Mohamad and myself, although no decision was made on who should be prime minister.
There are two lies here. I have never discussed with Tun Mahathir on the issues of DPM and PM.
Najib’s belief that I had a secret meeting with Tun Mahathir on Dec. 3 last year where an agreement was sealed for Mukhriz Mahathir to be Prime Minister and me as Deputy Prime Minister is a total figment of imagination of Najib’s propanganda handlers – as such a meeting never took place and I had never discussed with Tun Mahathir on who should be Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister when Najib/UMNO/BN are ousted from Putrajaya in the 14GE.
Najib’s subsequent allegations that with such an “Ali Baba” arrangement, I would be “incredibly powerful” – “the most powerful individual” – as this would be a situation where the Deputy Prime Minister would choose who is to be the Prime Minister, instead of the Prime Minister choosing the Deputy Prime Minister, are equally far-fetched and nonsensical.
I want to ask Najib what medicine is he taking that he could believe in such nonsense arising from the “fevered imaginations” of his propaganda handlers?
If Najib could believe in such out-of-the-world nonsense, what else won’t the Prime Minister believe?
I am wondering whether Najib should see a psychiatrist.
I am utterly shocked that the Prime Minister of the land could utter such gibberish that Pakatan Harapan had only agreed on who will be Deputy Prime Minister, not the Prime Minister, that he could rhetorically ask:
“Who will it (Prime Minister) be? (Dr) Wan Azizah (Wan Ismail)? Anwar (Ibrahim)? Muhyiddin (Yassin)?
“What was strange was that the deputy prime minister will appoint the prime minister. This is ‘ali baba’. The opposition is ‘ali baba’.
“This proved that Pakatan Harapan has failed as a coalition as compared to BN, which has achieved consensus among its 13 components.”
Najib has now achieved a double first as Prime Minister of Malaysia – firstly, for making Malaysia into a “global kleptocracy” in seven short years; and secondly, for uttering such gibberish and garbage which none of the previous five Prime Ministers, Tunku Abdul Rahman, his father Tun Razak, Tun Hussein, Tun Mahathir and Tun Abdullah, had ever been guilty of or even come near.
Has Najib become an inveterate liar that he could utter such gibberish and garbage of lies, or has Najib become a mental case that he could believe in such nonsense?
Najib could not be more wrong when he accused the Opposition as “ali baba” as the Opposition leaders have come together as Malaysian patriots and nationalists to save Malaysia from becoming a global kleptocracy and getting into the trajectory hurtling towards a failed and rogue state.
It is Najib himself who is responsible for creating the biggest and most sinister “Ali Baba” partnership in Malaysia – the “Najib-Jho Low” Ali-Baba axis which catapulted Malaysia to a global kleptocracy with the largest world-wide financial scandal in recent times, the international multi-billion dollar 1MDB kleptocratic money-laundering scandal.
Jho Low has become an international kleptocratic fugitive from justice.
However, I have been informed that the Prime Minister had a long and extended secret meeting with Jho Low in his last visit to China.
Is Najib prepared to make a Ministerial statement in Parliament on Tuesday of all his dealings with Jho Low, in connection with the 1MDB scandal, his series of meetings with Jho Low who had described by the foreign media as “the flamboyant Malaysian playboy and “orchestrator”of the 1MDB sovereign wealth fund scandal, when and where such meetings took place, and whether it is true that he had long and extended secret meetings with Jho Low in his last official visit to China.
Najib boasted that the Barisan Nasional had achieved consensus among its 13 components.
This would mean that if PAS President, Hadi Awang’s private member’s motion on the RUU 355 is given priority to be voted on in the March/April Parliament, followed by the government takeover of Hadi’s private member’s motion, it would have the consensus and agreement of MCA, Gerakan, MIC and the Sabah/Sarawak BN component parties.
I want to thank Najib for such clarification as if Hadi’s private member’s motion is passed in Parliament, MCA, Gerakan, MIC and the Sabah/Sarawak BN component parties cannot claim ignorance or evade responsibility!
DAP PARLIAMENTARY LEADER & MP FOR GELANG PATAH

Wednesday, March 1, 2017

The great cholesterol con finally unravels

The great cholesterol con finally unravels: Researchers find lowering cholesterol has NO EFFECT on risk of heart disease or death

Cholesterol
(NaturalNews) Common dietary advice is to avoid saturated fats and instead consume polyunsaturated fats, like those found in vegetable oils. But this dietary consensus is starting to crack in the face of study after study showing no health benefit to avoiding saturated fat.

The most recent study was conducted by researchers from the universities of North Carolina and Illinois, in conjunction with the National Institutes of Health, and published in the British Medical Journal. It found that while a diet that replaced saturated fat with polyunsaturated fat did cause blood cholesterol to drop, this led to no change in the risk of heart disease or death.

Except among the people who had the greatest drop in blood cholesterol. Those became more likely to die.

Cholesterol? Saturated fat? Probably fine

The researchers re-analyzed data gathered from the 1970s Minnesota Coronary Experiment, in which 9,423 residents of state mental hospitals and a nursing home were randomly assigned to either keep the same diet or to replace butter and other saturated fats with polyunsaturated fats (in the form of margarine and corn oil).

There was no connection at all between polyunsaturated fat consumption and heart disease risk.

The study did not examine another category of fats, monounsaturated fats, found in high levels in olive oil and many nuts.

The researchers concluded that there has been an "overestimation of the benefits of replacing saturated fat with vegetable oils."

British cardiologist Aseem Malhotra, and adviser to the National Obesity Forum, agrees.

"The public health message needs to change to focus on dietary changes that are proven to improve health and that means following a high fat Mediterranean style diet."

The official consensus on cholesterol has already started to change. In 2015, the United States became the last nation on earth to drop its warning against dietary cholesterol, after the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee concluded that there is no scientific evidence of a connection between cholesterol intake and heart disease.

Even so, the government was reluctant to abandon its former position entirely, and still recommends "eat[ing] as little dietary cholesterol as possible." In spite of – it bears repeating – absolutely no evidence that dietary cholesterol is bad for your health.

The U.S. Dietary Guidelines still recommend that people limit their intake of saturated fat, but evidence suggests that this may be the next false dietary idol to fall. A number of major studies have repeatedly shown that people with a high saturated fat intake are no more likely to die early than people who eat less of it.

In 2015, a paper in the British Medical Journal reviewed the results of 50 prior studies into the connection between saturated fats, trans fats and health outcomes. They found strong evidence that trans fats are dangerous – a 21 percent increase in heart disease risk, a 28 percent increase in death from coronary heart disease risk, and a 34 percent increase in risk of early death from all causes.

They found no evidence that saturated fats are bad for health. None.

It was the sixth study in recent years to find the same thing: Trans fats are terrible for your body. Saturated fats seem to do no harm. Other studies, in fact, have suggested that saturated fats, as essential nutrients, actively promote good health.

Drug industry will resist new findings

Why are government agencies and the medical establishment so reluctant to abandon their outdated guidelines in the face of overwhelming new evidence? In part, people are simply slow to change their ideas.

In part, it is likely due to the disproportionate influence of the drug industry, which wants to keep a high market for its blockbuster cholesterol-lowering drugs, statins – the best-selling prescription drugs of all time.

Scientists are now beginning to challenge the blind acceptance that has characterized the establishment attitude toward statins since their introduction 20 years ago. Strong proof that the drugs effectively lower blood cholesterol levels by blocking the activity of an enzyme involved in cholesterol synthesis caused statins to be quickly embraced as a "miracle drug." The threshold for people to be placed on these drugs for life continues to drop.

But as the most recent study has reiterated, blood cholesterol may be a marker for heart disease, but it's certainly not a cause. And according to a study published in the Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology in 2015, statins may actually increase the risk of heart disease.

Another study published in the same journal last year reviewed prior studies on the safety and effectiveness of the drugs. It found that the effectiveness of the drugs was only a paltry 1 percent reduction in heart disease risk, not the 36 to 54 percent claimed by the drug companies. At the same time, it found shockingly high rates of serious side effects.

"Increased rates of cancer, cataracts, diabetes, cognitive impairments and musculoskeletal disorders more than offset the modest cardiovascular benefits of statin treatment," the researchers wrote.

Will the AG investigate his own wife

Will the AG investigate his own wife, asks Ramasamy

 | March 1, 2017
DAP members lodge police report against former housing minister and wife of attorney-general following yesterday’s landmark ruling on compensation to house buyers.
p-ramasamy
GEORGE TOWN: Will the attorney-general investigate his own wife for alleged misrepresentation, DAP’s P Ramasamy asked today, following news that the AG’s wife purportedly lobbied for an extension of time on a condo project, from a federal minister.
Ramasamy said Batu Kawan DAP leaders Satees Muniandy and P David Marshel had lodged police reports in Bukit Mertajam yesterday, urging cops to investigate the AG’s wife for cheating.
Two days ago, the Kuala Lumpur High Court ruled in favour of 104 buyers of a condominium on Jalan Kuchai Lama who had sought compensation for late delivery of their units.
The buyers sought to nullify a 12-month extension given by the housing minister to the condo’s builders. Under the extension, the builders were given 48 months to deliver the units, from 36 months earlier.
Former housing minister Abdul Rahman Dahlan granted the extension, following a letter from a person claiming to be the director of the developer company, BHL Construction Sdn Bhd (BHL).
 
Yesterday, DAP parliamentary leader Lim Kit Siang in his blog claimed a person by the name of Faridah Begum K A Abdul Kader was the person who had written on behalf of BHL. Lim added that Faridah was the wife of AG Mohamed Apandi Ali.
Lim said according to the Companies’ Commission records, Faridah was not listed as a director of BHL.
Ramasamy asked how Faridah could act on behalf of the company when she was not a director.
“First, it would be interesting to speculate whether AG Mohamed Apandi Ali would be willing to investigate and take action against his wife if these allegations are true.
“Second, will the AG direct his officers to file charges against Rahman if he had abused his ministerial powers to accommodate the private and selfish interests of BHL?
“Third, will the AG charge the board of directors of BHL if found that they had misled the housing minister?” Ramasamy asked in a press conference at Komtar here today.
Ramasamy also vowed to lodge a report with the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC).
FMT has contacted Apandi and is awaiting his reply.

Nigeria: Christian lawyer receiving death threats for defending victims of Fulani attacks - Where are the Christian state leaders of the World to voice out for the BLOOD of their brethren!

  Nigeria: Christian lawyer in hiding after receiving death threats for defending victims of Fulani attacks Nigeria: Christian lawyer in hid...